Getting married was a smart business move as well as a personal
milestone for Facebook (FB.O) chief Mark Zuckerberg, with the timing of
the wedding, the day after the company's initial public offering,
potentially proving particularly advantageous, California divorce
lawyers said on Sunday.
Assuming the couple signed a prenuptial agreement, as most
wealthy Californians do, Zuckerberg and Chan would have agreed exactly
how to split assets, including his Facebook stock, if their marriage
dissolved in future. Even without a prenup, the wedding's timing would
help establish the value of their assets in the event of any future
divorce battle, lawyers said.
A spokeswoman for Facebook declined to comment on whether the couple signed such an agreement.
Priscilla Chan and Zuckerberg live together in the modest house in Palo Alto, Calif., where they were married on Saturday.
The couple met as undergraduates at Harvard University in
2004. Zuckerberg, now 28, dropped out of college to work on Facebook,
while Chan, a pediatrician, stayed to earn her undergraduage degree in
2007.
Chan's work led to Facebook creating an organ donation page. The pair recently travelled to China.
Had they continued the status quo, Chan could potentially lay
claim to a much larger portion of assets, including a chunk of his $20
billion in Facebook shares, lawyers say.
"In California, people who live together without the benefit
of marriage could claim they had an agreement to pool resources and
efforts," said Napa, Calif., lawyer Robert Blevans. Although they are
hard to prove, "those claims can get really ugly."
Blevans cited the case of Anthony Maglica, the founder of the
company that makes Maglite flashlights. In 1994, an Orange County court
awarded $84 million to Maglica's girlfriend Claire, who took his name
and lived with him for 23 years. Although an appeals court reversed the
award in 1998, she later negotiated a $29 million settlement.
The same logic -- avoiding messy court fights -- enters into the calculus of a prenuptial agreement.
"One of the primary reasons that wealthy people enter into
prenups is to prevent the type of carnage that can come with divorce,"
said Garrett Dailey, an appellate attorney in Oakland, Calif., "Better
to sort it out in advance."
DIVIDING ASSETS
A prenuptial agreement in California typically states how
spouses would divide assets in the event of a divorce. The couple
usually waives the right to make claims based on community-property
laws, which state that any property created after the marriage is
essentially community property and should be split evenly after any
divorce.
California is one of a handful of states with
community-property laws. Most states rely on equitable-division rules,
which give more flexibility to a judge in dividing assets.
In Chan's case, she could lay claim to a portion of the
options and grants in Facebook stock that vest during the time of their
marriage, lawyers said.
If there were no prenup, or if there were and Chan contested
it, she could also try to go after stock Zuckerberg held previously if
she could claim it increased in value during the relationship and the
increase was due directly to Zuckerberg's efforts. Lawyers said that is
hard to prove for publicly-traded companies.
"In an organization of this size, that's not going to happen," Blevans said. read More
No comments:
Post a Comment